\nUniBank<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Finally, KPMG also made it clear that the Bank of Ghana was not to provide the document to any other party and not to use it to take any further decision, which they made sure to state they would not be responsible for.<\/span>
<\/span>\u201c\u2026Therefore you should not, without our prior written consent, refer to or use our name or the report for any other purpose, refer to our report in any investment memorandum, circular or any other document, or make it available or communicate it to any other party.\u201d<\/span>
So on the basis of this self admittedly flawed report, which its authors themselves described as not fully accurate and vowed not to take any responsibility for its fallout, the Bank of Ghana took the decision to collapse uniBank. The demands of KPMG also makes it clear why the BOG did not provide a copy to uniBank as per custom so they would be able to properly defend themselves.<\/span>
<\/span>The revelations in the leaked report, coupled by the huge questions raised in the feature authored by Mr Poku and many others, make it clear the Bank of Ghana acted at best in extremely bad faith, at worst with a sinister agenda, to shut down uniBank, which was one of the only indigenously owned banks in a sector dominated by foreign-owned multinationals.<\/span>
Considering the central Bank was doling out cash willy-nilly to other banks in worse situations than uniBank \u2014 their refusal to hear the shareholder\u2019s side of the story, take into consideration the simple steps needed to restore the bank and making the decision to close the bank on the basis of a flawed report \u2014 all point to a determination to reach a desired outcome already set by the Bank of Ghana at the beginning of the process.<\/span>
Simply put, as aptly phrased by Poku in his feature \u2014 the Bank of Ghana was indeed a judge and prosecutor in its own court.<\/span>
<\/span>Read the full report below<\/b>
<\/b> <\/b> |